The pure plant-based sweeteners stevia and monk fruit (Luo Han Guo) are pitted head-to-head in opposition to aspartame and Splenda.
Numerous synthetic sweeteners have been approved in North America by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, together with aspartame and sucralose (offered as Splenda), however there are additionally pure “high-intensity sweeteners” discovered in crops. The international marketplace for non-nutritive, or non-caloric, sweeteners, usually, is within the billions. This consists of all the unreal ones and two pure ones extracted from crops—stevia and monk fruit. You could recall I’ve mentioned stevia earlier than, however what about monk fruit? That’s the topic of my video Is Monk Fruit Sweetener Safe?.
“The fruits of Luo Han Guo [monk fruit in Chinese] have been used for hundreds of years in China as a natural sweetener and as a folk medicine….The non-caloric sweet taste…results primarily from mogrosides, a group of cucurbitane-type triterpene glycosides that are present at about 1% in the flesh of the fruit.”
“The mixed mogrosides have been estimated to be about 300 times as sweet as sucrose [table sugar] so that an 80% extract was nearly 250 times sweeter than sugar.” If you learn evaluations in Chinese pure drugs journals, you’ll see pronouncements like this: Monk fruit “has been shown to have the following effects: antitussive [anti-coughing], anti-asthmatic, anti-oxidation, liver-protection, glucose-lowering [blood sugar-lowering], immuno-regulation, and anti-cancer.” What they don’t inform you up entrance, nevertheless, is that they’re speaking about decreasing ammonia-induced mouse coughs. What is this a few “natural food sweetener with anti-pancreatic cancer properties”? Indeed, monk fruit “may be used for daily consumption as an additive in foods and drinks to prevent or treat pancreatic cancer”—in your pet mouse. There was a examine conducted on the “antiproliferative activity of triterpene glycoside nutrient from monk fruit in colorectal cancer and throat cancer,” nevertheless it was on colorectal and throat most cancers cells in a petri dish. As you may see at 1:53 in my video, researchers did show mogrosides killing off colorectal most cancers cells and throat most cancers cells, and our digestive tract could possibly be uncovered straight to those compounds if we ate them. What’s lacking, although? The researchers didn’t check it in opposition to regular cells. I imply, you may pee in a petri dish and kill off most cancers cells, however the entire level is to search out one thing that kills off most cancers whereas leaving regular cells alone, one thing the researchers weren’t in a position to present on this examine.
Are there any human research on monk fruit? We’re in luck. “Owing to the rapidly growing popularity of natural plant-derived compounds, it will be of interest to determine whether natural NNS [non-nutritive sweeteners] would be a healthier alternative to sugar and artificial NNS for consumers.” So, researchers randomized individuals to drink drinks sweetened with both aspartame, monk fruit, stevia, or desk sugar. They then measured blood sugars over 24 hours and discovered there was no vital distinction amongst any of the 4 sweeteners. Wait a second. As you may see at 2:58 in my video, the sugar group was given 16 spoonsful of sugar, the quantity of added sugar in a 20-ounce bottle of Coke. So, the opposite three teams consumed 16 fewer spoonsful of sugar but nonetheless had the identical common blood sugars?
Table sugar causes a giant blood sugar spike, as you may see at 3:20 in my video. Drink that bottle of sugar water with its 16 spoonsful of sugar, and your blood sugars bounce 40 factors over the following hour. If you’re given a beverage sweetened with aspartame, monk fruit, or stevia, although, nothing occurs. That’s to be anticipated, proper? Those are non-caloric sweeteners with none energy, so isn’t it identical to ingesting water? In that case, how might your each day blood sugar values common out the identical as ingesting the sugar-sweetened drink? The solely approach that might occur is that if the non-calorie sweeteners by some means made your blood sugar spikes worse later within the day.
Indeed, when individuals drink Splenda combined with sugar water, they get a better blood sugar spike and a better insulin spike chugging the sugar with sucralose (Splenda) than with out, although Splenda alone causes no spike of its personal, as you may see at 4:04 in my video. What about aspartame? Does it do the identical factor? At the one-hour mark, the researchers fed the examine individuals an everyday lunch, and their blood sugars went again up and down as they usually would after a meal. In the sugar group, their post-lunch ranges didn’t spike as excessive as they did an hour earlier after they drank straight sugar water, although; there was only a light up and down. In the aspartame group, nevertheless, although their blood sugars didn’t rise on the time they drank the aspartame-sweetened beverage, their blood sugars shot up greater, an hour later at lunch, as if they’d simply drank a bottle of soda.
What in regards to the pure sweeteners? What occurred within the stevia and monk fruit teams? The identical factor occurred. There was the identical exaggerated blood sugar spike after an everyday meal eaten an hour after ingesting the naturally sweetened drinks. And, keep in mind, this even if the three non-caloric sweetener teams—aspartame, stevia, and monk fruit—took in 16 fewer spoonsful of sugar. So, you may see the way it all equals out when it comes to common blood sugars, at the very least partly as a result of these within the non-caloric sweetener teams ate extra. After ingesting a Diet Coke, you’re extra more likely to eat extra at your subsequent meal than after ingesting an everyday Coke. In reality, you’re more likely to eat a lot extra that the vitality “saved” from changing sugar with non-caloric sweeteners is absolutely compensated for at subsequent meals, so there is no such thing as a distinction present in whole each day calorie consumption. The sugar-sweetened beverage led to massive spikes in each blood sugar and insulin, whereas these responses had been greater for the three different drinks following the lunch eaten later. So, in the case of calorie consumption, blood sugars, or insulin spikes, they had been all simply as unhealthy.
Is Stevia Good for You? is the video I discussed.
- The international marketplace for non-caloric sweeteners is within the billions and consists of synthetic sweeteners like aspartame and sucralose (offered as Splenda), in addition to two pure ones extracted from crops—stevia and monk fruit (Luo Han Guo).
- Monk fruit has been used for hundreds of years in China as each a pure sweetener and a people drugs. The non-caloric candy style has been estimated to be about 300 occasions as candy as desk sugar, and monk fruit has been mentioned to be antitussive (anti-coughing), anti-asthmatic, anti-cancer, and extra, however these had been from animal and petri dish research.
- When researchers randomized human topics to drink drinks sweetened with aspartame, monk fruit, stevia, or desk sugar and then measured their blood sugars over 24 hours, no vital distinction was discovered amongst any of the 4 sweeteners regardless of the sugar group getting 16 spoonsful of sugar, the quantity of added sugar in a 20-ounce bottle of Coke.
- Although the three non-caloric sweetener teams—aspartame, stevia, and monk fruit—took in 16 fewer spoonsful of sugar, all of it equaled out when it comes to common blood sugars. This is due partly to these within the non-caloric sweetener teams consuming extra. Indeed, after ingesting a Diet Coke, you’re extra more likely to eat extra at your subsequent meal than after ingesting an everyday Coke and usually tend to eat a lot extra that the vitality “saved” from changing sugar with non-caloric sweeteners is absolutely compensated for at subsequent meals.
- The sugar-sweetened beverage led to massive spikes in each blood sugar and insulin, however the responses had been greater for the three non-caloric sweetened drinks following lunch eaten an hour later. So, in the case of calorie consumption, blood sugars, or insulin spikes, they had been all equally unhealthy.
I additionally produce other movies on synthetic sweeteners, together with aspartame and Splenda:
Of course, sugar isn’t good for you, both. How Much Added Sugar Is Too Much? and Flashback Friday: If Fructose Is Bad, What About Fruit? Watch the movies to be taught extra.
Can you overdo fruit? Find out in Flashback Friday: How Much Fruit Is Too Much?.
In well being,
Michael Greger, M.D.
PS: If you haven’t but, you may subscribe to my free movies right here and watch my dwell shows: